READERS of TCW are fully aware of the evidence showing that the experimental covid vaccines were neither safe nor effective: that millions of people worldwide died or suffered (or continue to suffer) serious and often disabling adverse effects linked directly to these injections. They will also be aware that although the science is now clear on these facts, Western medical establishments and governments remain in denial and have yet to be held to account.
Nonetheless cracks in the covid establishment facade are beginning to appear. As reported in TCW, Dr Helmut Sterz, who led Pfizer’s European toxicology centres between 2001 and 2007, recently gave a highly critical deposition to Germany’s pandemic inquiry, the German Bundestag (federal parliament) Corona Enquete-Kommission (formal inquiry). In the Netherlands a civil case is currently being heard at the District Court of Leeuwarden in which the architects of the covid vaccine – the case’s high-profile defendants – are accused of ‘biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit, and assault’.
However Australia may prove to be the country where the dam finally bursts. There a remarkable young legal professional, Jayden Beale, is single-handedly bringing what he hopes to be the largest human rights case in the world: one that will finally show how governments experimented on the general public with drugs that were neither proved safe or effective.
Queensland’s state government imposed covid vaccine mandates on its people for four months in 2021-2022, significantly restricting the civil liberties of any non-vaccinated person. Beale has been tirelessly litigating this case at QCAT (the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal) at his own expense for more than three years to bring the Queensland government to justice regarding the unconscionable, unethical and illegal implementation of those mandates. This is truly a Goliath versus David fight.
Court documents appear to show that the Queensland chief health officer at the time did not give the mandates for any proper public health purpose. In particular, the state government has refused to provide any evidence that the covid vaccines prevented transmission of the virus. The chief health officer has since resigned. It is now understood that the legal team at Queensland Health is under internal investigation for ‘suspected corrupt conduct and/or Public Interest disclosure’. Beale is being assisted by a King’s Counsel barrister.
In summary the case has been brought to examine whether it was lawful for government to mandate emergency use covid vaccines on the general public in circumstances where those vaccines were still being tested in their experimental clinical trials. It has alleged historic human rights violations, including that the government subjected the general public to medical experimentation, and marginalised people from public and social life if they did not comply. Thirteen senior experts have given evidence against the government on behalf of the public interest.
The Queensland government has attempted on six different occasions to dismiss the case. It has now forfeited its ability to file evidence due to missing the filing date of October 24, 2025. Instead, the court now has to hear evidence in support of the general public from the following 13 scientists and medical professionals:
- Professor of medicine Wendy Hoy – University of Queensland (renowned Professor and Officer of the Order of Australia)
- Professor of oncology Angus Dalgleish – University of London (a regular TCW writer)
- Professor of immunology Robert Clancy – University of Newcastle (renowned Professor and ‘father’ of mucosal immunology and Member of the Order of Australia)
- Professor of nutritional medicine Ian Brighthope – president of Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine
- Associate Professor Peter Parry – psychiatrist at the University of Queensland
- Dr Phillip Altman – senior pharmacologist and former TGA consultant
- Dr Paul Costantino – senior lecturer in immunology and microbiology at Curtin University, Western Australia
- Dr Rikki Andersen – microbiologist at the Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland
- Chris Barnett – research infrastructure manager at the Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland
- Dr Conni Turni – veterinary microbiologist at the University of Queensland
- Dr James Rowe – pharmaceutical chemist and pharmacist
- Dr Luke McLindon – senior gynaecologist and obstetrician, formerly Mater Private Hospital, Brisbane
- Dr Mel McCann – specialised general practitioner
All these experts have filed expert reports with the court.
(In addition to allegations of widespread medical experimentation and violations of individual medical freedom, the case is also a landmark religious freedom fight defending against an argument by the government that a Christian may not rely upon the Bible as the basis for their belief. The case is therefore seeking to uphold one of the most sacred religious traditions, which is the ability for religious people to read and apply their holy book to their life.)
As indicated above, the government, in reply to the scientific reports filed by the 13 experts, has refused to file any evidence of its own after almost four years of litigation. It has requested the Court for the first time in the history of human rights law to rule in in its favour without a trial. It has made this remarkable request despite the case simultaneously sparking an anti-corruption investigation into its written legal defence, and whether the government’s lawyers lied about the reasons for the vaccine mandates on the public.
Australia however is one of the few jurisdictions in the world that has a ‘Human Rights Act’. This means that there is a legislative right for applicants to go to trial on human rights violations. This case, Jayden Beale says, must proceed to trial due to section 59 of the above Human Rights Act. He has received notices and directions by the Court confirming the matter will now be heard on April 30, 2026.
Beale writes: ‘Our King’s Counsel who has joined this case is passionate but is charging fees at a reduced rate. We are hoping for public support and awareness to help us ensure this King’s Counsel stays on the matter and experts like Dr Angus Dalgleish and Dr Robert Clancy are able finally to get into court this year. We are running all the important arguments on behalf of the public about the loss of liberties, religious freedom and the dangers of these vaccines. Courts around the world will be able to refer to a judgment in this case as a persuasive legal precedent supported by 13 scientific and medical experts, and multiple religious academics.’
If you wish to help Jayden Beale’s pursuit of this case, his Give Send Go funding pagecan be found here.
