ON Wednesday, a group of mostly white working-class men protested against the ridiculous claim by Surrey Police that they do not have ‘sufficient information’ to describe the gang rapists of a woman outside Epsom Methodist Church on Saturday. The protesters were confronted by police in full riot gear.
Yet two weeks ago, hundreds of mostly non-white youths, organised on social media, swarmed Clapham High Street. They ran riot, jostled pedestrians, shoplifted, let off fireworks, blocked the streets, and assaulted first responders. A few police officers showed up to observe from their cars. Eventually 100 officers were deployed, of whom four were assaulted. They issued a dispersal order, and (later still) arrested three girls.
Such two-tier policing aggravates the tensions in Epsom.
Some in the area suspect that migrants carried out the rape, that the police are hiding what they know for fear of exacerbating racial tensions, and are countering protesters not so much to protect the public as to protect themselves.
The British people are not ignorant of previous cases of police and politicians covering up sexual violence by migrants and their children.
Last month, Afghan asylum seeker Ahmad Mulakhil was jailed for 15 years for the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. This was after Warwickshire Police had advised local councillors and officials not to disclose his background for fear of ‘inflaming community tensions’.
Warwickshire Police still deny fault. The force claims that it chose not to admit Mulakhil’s identity only because it was waiting on the Home Office to confirm the asylum claims.
The child rape in Nuneaton happened just one week after protests started outside a hotel in Epping, where an Ethiopian asylum-seeker was living at taxpayers’ expense when he sexually assaulted a 14-year-old. Epping was the site of the largest and longest protests against asylum centres last summer. Police there bussed counter-protesters from the railway station to the hotel, nominally for their protection. And yet the Government’s response was to persuade the High Court that asylum claimants possess rights which trump the rights of Epping residents.
The crime in Epping took place more than a year after the Government covered up the background of Axel Rudakubana, a second-generation immigrant, who stabbed to death three girls in Southport in July 2024. Taking advantage of misinformation on social media that he was a recent asylum claimant, the Government characterised him as a ‘Welsh choirboy’ and characterised protesters as ‘far right’. Then the Attorney General initiated the fast-tracking of the prosecution of Lucy Connolly for an angry tweet in reaction to the crime. Conveniently, she is married to a former councillor from the same party as His Majesty’s Opposition.
The crime in Southport happened almost a year after a surge in anti-Semitic marches and vigilantism in support of Hamas’s invasion of Israel in October 2023, with the express intent to murder, rape, and kidnap civilians on a vast scale.
Since then, anti-Semites, Islamists, and their useful idiot co-travellers from the radical left have closed streets and city centres for hate-filled marches, speeches and prayers, while counter-protesters are arrested without committing offences.
Two years later, in October 2025, the Government pretended it needs new legislation to stop them only to grant itself new powers to crack down on its political factions it opposes, such as the splinter group Palestine Action.
In that same October of 2025, West Midlands Police invented intelligence of threats from Israeli football fans to ban them from Birmingham with the connivance of Muslim ‘community leaders’ who said they couldn’t control their brethren if Jews were allowed to visit. Yes, eventually the chief of that force was exposed and resigned – but with impunity and his pension intact.
Privileging foreigners and the children of immigrants, and covering up crime by migrants and their children, have been official norms for years – for decades in the case of mostly Muslim immigrant child-rapists.
Just this week, we have learned from the report that followed the inquiry into the Southport murders that in late 2021 Rudakubana’s deputy head teacher had warned the authorities about the ‘sinister’ behaviour of the future killer, identifying him rightly as ‘high risk’, only to be accused by a mental health case worker of racially stereotyping him as a ‘black boy with a knife’. Hmm.
Yet despite the collapse in trust for British teachers, social workers, police, and judges, the authorities just can’t help themselves. Officials dump hundreds of asylum claimants at a time on unforewarned communities. Such claimants are self-selected — mostly young men, from unstable, violent places, without any vetting or restrictions. Police provide security, and use trespass and even counter-terrorism laws to intimidate and remove curious residents and journalists. The migrants get to travel freely, even though they have a statistically elevated propensity for crime in general and sexual crime in particular.
When sexual crime occurs the police tend to react by refusing to identify the suspects (even though a description would help the public to provide evidence). The court advises attendees on what they may say outside court. Police and journalists may not identify suspects for ‘legal reasons’.
Surrey Police are adding a new contrivance. They claim they cannot identify the suspects for lack of ‘information’. I don’t believe it. The authorities routinely identify other rape suspects by name, age, address, any criminal record – even though a false accusation can ruin a man’s life. Even if the defendant is found not guilty, or charges are dropped, he has no right to expunge records.
Yet if you’re not white British, you get the de facto privilege of anonymity when arrested for rape, at least for a time – during the first days to weeks, when most of the records are laid down in the media, and the public has most evidence to give. That period of unnecessary enforced silence might even help a perpetrator to escape justice and a victim to be denied it.
Meanwhile, the rest of us continue to be terrorised by declining public safety and a deeply unfair two-tier system of justice bolstered by extreme left-wing myths that white boys are most disposed to violent sexual crimes, that the ‘far right’ is over-represented in terrorism and that popular parties and policies are ‘fascist’.
