HAS THIS country ever suffered such a cold-hearted, calculating, dishonest Prime Minister? And are we experiencing a government, under the iron rule of Two-Tier Keir, that will become impossible to remove?
The seemingly bland Sir Keir Starmer is fast emerging as one of those most dangerous of people – a silent but uncompromising ideologue.Few have questioned his past, but we should. Why did he embark on a trip to a work camp in Soviet Czechoslovakia in 1986, at the height of the Cold War? Here are Comrade Keir’s details from the Czechoslovakian secret police archives. What or who motivated him? On what basis did he qualify to be secretary of the communist Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers for 20 years until he was appointed as DPP? Read their stand on what they call ‘the recent far right insurrectionary activities‘ following the Southport murders to see Starmer’s joined-up thinking with his previous UK communist attachment. Then there is his curious obsession with ending the death penalty worldwide, detailed by Laura Perrins on Tuesday.
Sir Keir has risen to the top of the Labour hierarchy through a deftly camouflaged insincerity and crafted dullness – no one offended, no one an enemy. He dislodged the noisy old-school communists such as Corbyn who were calling too much attention to their hard-left proclivities and made people think he was centre left. Yet under scrutiny his path to victory looks to be one of carefully hidden but even more tyrannical purpose of the ‘true believer’; his position the culmination of his own ‘human rights’ march through the institutions.
He won the election thanks to an almost universal disillusionment with the Tories, but also thanks to a gamut of barefaced lies – to farmers, business owners, students, pensioners, WASPI women, and the whole white- and blue-collar working population, all the while conveying a stodgily safe persona to the middle classes.
Along with Starmer came a majority cohort of eager socialist MPs, happily endorsing his ruination of Britain and destruction of freedoms. Never have so many empty-headed nodding bean-counters filled the Chamber, genuflecting to his every word, enabling him to implement his Socialist serfdom ‘human rights for everyone else’ multicultural dream, whatever the cost.
Despite the economic downturn and chaos brought upon Britain in just six months of his tenure, the outing of his lies, hypocrisy and greed followed by revelations of Labour involvement in and Starmer’s obfuscation over Pakistani rape gang activities and, last but not least, his blatant lying and cover-up of Axel Rudakubana’s extremist and violent past, amazingly over a quarter of the population still support him and Labour.
There can be little doubt that under the bland exterior Starmer is ruthless and implacable. A country traumatised by vile rape gang revelations and the even more terrifying Southport murder trial facts, needed a leader able to empathise with people’s fear and horror. But instead of being truthful and reassuring the families of the victims this would never be allowed to happen again, he attacked, demonised and imprisoned the justifiably outraged, blaming them, not the perps nor the government multicultural policy behind it, and now that their outrage is vindicated he lays the blame everywhere except at his own front door, the ticking metronome of the true believer almost audible in his head: tick tock, tick tock, keeping a steady, robotic cadence as he delivers in monotone whatever lies he is propagating at the time to the great unwashed whom he disdains.
The ghost of Stalin has one hand up his back and Davos Man has the other as he projects the casual, callous indifference of the anti-human virus they both share, visible in his treatment of OAPs, farmers, rape-gang victims, the victims of the Southport demon and their relatives alike, in fact to all those with concerns about the country’s direction of travel, on whom his two-tier justice relentlessly falls.
Will the 4,000 pensioners that he previously assured Parliament would die if the winter fuel allowance was withdrawn draw warmth from his assertion that they are doing their bit to fix the NHS through their sacrifice?
Will thousands of farming families feel their lost pastures and herds are better off under the ownership of BlackRock or other voracious conglomerates?
Will the thousands of raped and tortured under-age girls be happy their cases are not going to become public knowledge because the vast majority of perpetrators, enablers and politicians covering up these crimes will never be called to face justice, while ever more fighting- and raping-age illegal immigrants are welcomed into the country and housed and fed in these communities?
Will the parents of the Southport victims ever have the opportunity to look Starmer in the eye and ask him why he covered up the facts of the case or why, after he had hastily laid flowers in the town, did he rush off to give assurances of safety to the Iman and congregants of the local mosque?
Predictably he refused the full public inquiry needed into the rape gangs in favour of toothless local inquiries, run by the very people who have brushed their local scandals, culpability and criminality under the carpet to date.
Will the public inquiry he has called into the Southport terror prove any better or does it reflect a ruthless confidence that it can steered from the start into making recommendations to suit his ‘true believer’ purposes? Almost undoubtedly.
He seems unperturbed by criticism, impervious to his plummeting popularity – Guido reported a new low yesterday – but doubles down instead. The latest extension of hate crime destines all those who don’t wind in our necks and stay silent on the issues that most concern us to be targets of Starmer’s swift justice, with speedy trials and excessive sentences.
British white working classes and any citizens who support them are to be disdained and marginalised. If that means trampling over our children’s safety to protect his freedom-killing, dehumanising ideology and his own power base, so be it.
This is the brutal moral-free zone that our PM inhabits, leaving me with one question that should concern us all.
By the time we get to 2029 and the next General Election, will he have gerrymandered the democratic landscape and corrupted the legal process to such an extent that it’s nigh on impossible to remove him?
