Culture WarFeaturedLaura Perrins

‘Diversity is our strength’: The cult of the True Believers

ON FRIDAY, Konstantin Kisin tweeted the following: ‘Something I’ve often wondered about: if “diversity is our greatest strength” why is it that we have to be reminded of that after every terrorist attack?’

The reason is that the governing powers – both left and right – really believe it. When they say diversity is our strength or, as Fraser Nelson would say, Britain has experienced an integration miracle, it’s because deep down in their heart of hearts, they think it is true. That’s how bad things are. That’s why things are the way they are and why it is so difficult to make any real change.

This is how it goes these days in the West. There is another diversity stabbing of children, three little girls in Southport, or the Afghan ‘asylum seeker’ who killed a two-year-old boy and seriously wounded other infants in the Bavarian town of Aschaffenburg, or the murder of 22 at an Ariana Grande show aimed at little girls, or the gang rape of girls in multiple towns, or the murder of journalists over a cartoon in a magazine, and before the bodies are cold we will be told that diversity is our strength. We are told this because they believe it and you better believe it too. And if you don’t believe it, you will end up like Peter Lynch, rounded up by the Old Bill for not believing that diversity is our strength and then killing yourself in some Godforsaken British prison.

Sadly, we are controlled by the True Believers. The True Believers are in Downing Street and the entire legal system is chock-a-block with them. They are in the media, academia and many corporations. To understand the True Believers I turn to Thomas Sowell.  

In his brilliant 1996 book, The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, Sowell describes how the governing class view the world and themselves. They have a particular vision of the world that they believe is moral and a better vision of the world than the ordinary British voter has (my words, not his).

Sowell: ‘The rise of the mass media, mass politics and mass government means that the beliefs which drive a relatively small group of articulate people have great leverage in determining the course taken by a whole society.’

It makes perfect sense that Sir Keir Starmer was PM when the Southport massacre occurred. Starmer built his career as an articulate lawyer, which is why he sounds so wooden in politics. That career was at one of the most left-wing sets in the bar, Doughty Street Chambers. The very talented barristers at Doughty Street will judicially review the government to death should they dare enact a policy that has the support of the voters such as deporting foreign rapists or cutting back the welfare state. These lawyers are the anointed and they have a vision of society that is very different from that of the ordinary British voter.

It is no coincidence, then, that Sir Keir Starmer leveraged his talents to pretty much end the death penalty in certain jurisdictions where the Privy Council still has authority. This means that all this chat about Rudakubana receiving the death penalty is a waste of time and energy. The anointed have already settled that matter.

Starmer, of all people, is not going to pull the UK out of numerous international human rights agreements so the UK can hang ’em high. If you knew how ridiculous this sounds you wouldn’t bother tweeting it. (For the record, I do not believe the death penalty should be given to someone who commits a crime under 18. Sorry.)

Starmer has links to an army of lawyers who, as I have said, have spent their entire careers judicially reviewing the government when that government tries to implement a policy they have a mandate for. When they are not doing that they can be found at the immigration tribunal arguing why the latest rapist shouldn’t be deported to whatever Godforsaken country they come from. All of this was made possible by Tony Blair and the Human Rights Act 1998 that has imposed his vision on society long after he left office. Genius, when you think about it.

It is this vision of a diverse Britain imposed by a relatively small group of articulate people using the Human Rights Act 1998 (paid for by the taxpayer via legal aid) that has been imposed on Britain for the last twenty to thirty years. And you fools thought you could change it all at the ballot box. Don’t be silly.

Sowell states that according to the anointed, ‘problems exist because others are not as wise or as virtuous as the anointed’. If you apply this to immigration you understand why we are where we are. The voters are stupid, they are not experts, they don’t understand that the economy needs immigration. Our NHS needs to steal nurses from poorer countries. As for those less virtuous, these are the racist, fascist and Right Wing Thugs that walk among us.

Sowell again: ‘People are never more sincere than when they assume their own moral superiority.’

As such, when the politicians and lawyers or the lawyers who are now politicians (the very worst kind of leaders) say, diversity is our strength, they really believe it. They know that a diverse Britain is a morally superior one to the one you have in mind – one that is less diverse. This is why they do what they do.

This is what is so frightening, far more frightening than any conspiracy theory or idea that they intend to destroy Britain with open borders and mass immigration. It’s the exact opposite: they believe they are improving Britain with mass immigration. Therefore they believe that by importing the father of Axel Rudakubana they are Making Britain Great At Last. That’s your horror story.

The elite have a vision of Britain and it is one of open borders and ultra-diversity. The elite believe their vision is morally superior to yours and if that means that a few thousand girls get raped by a few ‘bad apples’ and a few girls get stabbed here and there, this is the price you must pay for a Better more Diverse Britain.

Mark Steyn says: ‘Sir Keir is, as a practical matter, an accomplice of the stabbers and gang rapists. He would rather your pre-adolescent daughter gets anally branded and your kindergartner dies from up to 122 stab wounds than permit the citizenry to dissent from the state ideology that “diversity is our strength”. Which, as a practical matter, means that those who would destroy our society retain a monopoly of violence.’

And he is right on that: Starmer is willing to let these horrors happen because they are worth it for a Diverse Britain.

Think about it. Do you really expect any of the ruling class who have inflicted this horror show (including Conservative leaders such as Cameron, May and especially Boris Johnson, as well as Tony Blair) to say, sorry, we got it wrong. This would cause a total psychological breakdown. How would you feel if you realised that ayou were partly responsible for the deaths of Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, that their blood was on your hands?

It’s not going to happen as that amounts to nothing less than treason, child rape and child murder.

So we are left with articles like this from the Sunday Times. 

Usually I like Matthew Syed, a perfect example of an integrated child of immigration if ever there was one. But that piece made me feel sick. I don’t know how you could write about ‘hope’ after reading the victim impact statements delivered by the families in Liverpool Crown Court.

I haven’t felt hope, only profound sadness. Lately, I have lingered extra-long at my ten-year-old daughter’s bed time. ‘We would do anything to hold Alice one more time,’ said her devastated family. They will never get that chance. Ever. Atheists like Matthew Syed and Keir Starmer believe that the parents of Alice, Bebe and Elsie will never see their children again. There is nothing else. Yet they talk about ‘hope’.

I get to hold my daughter whenever I want. When I think about those families it hurts but I experience only a millionth of the pain they must feel every hour of every day. For them, there is no hope. And to pretend otherwise is an insult to them.

I don’t think there is much hope for Britain either. Not while the anointed keep pushing their vision on to everyone else. And they never even asked for permission. 



Source link

What's your reaction?

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.