PLEASE send your letters (as short as you like) to info@conservativewoman.co.uk and mark them ‘Letter to the Editor’. We need your name and a county address, e.g. Yorkshire or London. Letters may be shortened. There is no guarantee of publication.
***
Letter of the week: Farage v the Deep State
Dear Editor
Dominic Cummings has warned Nigel Farage that Whitehall will break the law to prevent Reform winning power. On the Spectator’s ‘Quite Right!’ podcast, Cummings said: ‘They’ll leak medical records, they’ll leak tax records. They’ll bug his phone and leak that. They’ll do anything that they need to.’
The Establishment across Europe are doing everything they can, legal and illegal, to stop populist parties taking power. The Deep State can’t allow the humble voter to choose the Government they want.
Heaven forbid, the voters might elect a party that doesn’t deliver the agenda of the Deep State!
Brian Silvester
Crewe
***
God is our partner
Dear Editor,
What an astonishingly convoluted piece about the existence of God by Peter Mullen on December 28.
Surely it boils down very simply to how one goes about choosing what to believe, the very heart of the human condition. Do you need reasoning to believe in anything? I would call that conservatism. If you don’t need reason you must be a liberal leftie.
It seems to me that Mr Mullen’s belief in God is reasoned even if not evidential. As a technocratic type I can’t believe in the God or Gods of religion, but I can believe that the laws of science may thought of as God, which of course is God as the enabler of existence. Why wonder at the exactness of the laws of science since we can only have come about in exact compliance with them? God is no longer remote but partners us in everything we do.
Mike Gill
Hampshire
***
Sir Keir should have gone to Specsavers
Dear Editor
Poor Keir Starmer. No matter how many pairs of expensive spectacles are bought for him, he is still unable to see some of the files that cross his desk. Perhaps he should consult an optician?
Kathleen Carr
Sheffield
***
Multiculturalism is our real enemy
Dear Editor
The murders at a Hanukkah festival at Bondi Beach have attracted all the usual comments from the political class and media commentators. But they are all missing the point. The true catalyst for this event was not anti-Semitism, but multiculturalism, a policy contrived by politicians, bureaucrats, academics and the media, all bending the knee to globalism.
Multiculturalism is a policy that denies and defies the Australian Constitution, which expresses the culture of the nation in its Preamble: ‘Whereas the people of NSW, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessings of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Commonwealth under the Crown . . .’
Governments established under that Constitution have a duty to act in a manner consistent with its values, which were themselves derived from the Bible. It is safe to say that no government since Menzies has given any thought to their duty in this respect. A series of ungodly, evil and corrupt governments of both major political movements, has utterly ignored the responsibility to observe the cultural declaration contained in the Constitution.
Clearly, immigration should only be allowed of those who are willing and able to embrace the cultural expression in our Constitution, and if the Constitution doesn’t offer enough guidance to the political class, public opinion should, with polling consistently demonstrating that Australians were opposed to multiculturalism.
The most notable feature of the immigration policies followed by all governments in the last twenty years, is the vast increase in Muslim immigrants from African, Middle Eastern and Asian Islamic countries. In colonising various electorates, they have created a significant political force, with several Labor party MPs owing their seats to Islam. This has totally altered the nature and character of the Australia Labor Party, which now depends upon a combination of the multicultural vote, non-working parasites and sexual deviants, while loudly proclaiming their traditional mendacious mythology of representing the working class. What they don’t represent is traditional ordinary Australians, who work, marry, have children and contribute to the nation, those whose values and culture are reflected in the wording of our Constitution.
Once the Jews have been dealt with, the Muslims will turn on Christians, then all non-Muslims. Their objective, clearly set forth in their scriptures, is to force everyone to become a Muslim and worship Allah, or else pay the infidel’s tax and forfeit their civil rights. Islam has very obligingly written down their plan in considerable detail. Unfortunately, no one in government seems to be able to read.
Watchman Williams
South Australia
***
The affirmative approach to rights
Dear Editor
Even as I child I questioned why it was that we could not do this, or we could not do that. Then when force-fed the Bible it was all thou shall not do this, thou shall not do that.
If I were Head of Morality, I would have a much more affirmative approach, you should do this and you should do that. The onus being positive rather than negative.
For example, you should always be kind, you should always help others, you should always respect people’s freedom to speak. Thus, morality becomes a duty to your fellow citizens, not one of just avoidance of the obviously unacceptable.
Human rights then becomes a question of meeting the obligations placed on you, not entitlement.
Robert Worms
Totnes, Devon
***
Send in the hounds
Dear Editor
With a spiteful ban on trail hunting in the offing, there might soon be numbers of hounds in need of exercise. Might I suggest that their first run-out of the new year should be in the House of Commons?
John Rigby
Chorley, Lancashire
