News Briefs – 02/17/2025 | Anonymous Conservative

February 17, 2025

Untitled

Here are some news stories that might be of interest. Most articles will be more or less summarized in the headline. You can skim the headlines and summaries, and click the links if they are of interest. Keep in mind, many of these reports are products of an unreliable news media, so although they will be what people are hearing and talking about, there is no guarantee any one of them is necessarily correct, and we have had cases of outright lies make it onto these pages.

We have an advertiser, The Daily Financial Trends – a financial news aggregator.

If you have clicked on the page for this News Brief, this is a link that will take you directly to the comments section.

“Make sure those you follow talk about the surveillance, because everyone who is in the game knows. Make them either damage the machine by saying it, or reveal they are part of it by staying silent. Demanding our side talk about the surveillance is really the closest to a Xanatos gambit our side has.”

Visit AmericanStasi.com, the most important website on the internet, and see firsthand the massive Stasi-like domestic spying operation in the US which is targeting you and your loved ones.

_________________________________________

Aetherczar’s based book sale is running again through Tuesday and he included American Stasi:

https://basedbooksale.substack.com/p/2025-spring-based-book-sale

***************************************************************************

I have a question on reconciliation commissions, for anyone with legal knowledge. You have gangstalking, where a network of people join together in a criminal conspiracy to criminally harass specific people, suppressing and controlling their employment and income, personal associations, exercise of free speech, right to privacy, and position in society. They may even assault them with energetic weapons, in their homes. They create records and files documenting it all which get filed away, I assume.

Let’s say Trump declares a “reconciliation commission” for the “spying” as he has mentioned previously, where everybody reveals all, and is exempted from “consequences.” Supposedly that happened with the Stasi, however that was in communist East Germany, where the government was all powerful and could do just about anything. That bears no resemblance to our Constitutional republic in America.

How would that work here? Is that a pardon for the crimes? An agreement not to prosecute? Does he need the governors to offer state-level pardons or prosecutorial discretions too, for state-level crimes? Or does it require some kind of laws passed by Congress? If so, can Congress intrude federally, on state-level harassment laws to void them and let everyone off the hook? Or do they need all States to also pass their own laws voiding the various legal culpabilities, from assault, to harassment, to illegal surveillance?

And how does all that affect civil liability in private lawsuits? Can they wave away personal liability of each conspirator if they irradiated, say, Bill Binney’s house and his wife got cancer from it and died? What about Bill’s right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? What about his wife’s right to live? Can the government wave away Bill’s rights like that, as laid out in the founding documents of the nation, all “for the greater good?” That would seem a slippery slope, where in the future, lots of things in the Constitution suddenly can be waved away for a “greater good” in the eyes of some radical judge.

It seems if people’s fundamental rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” were violated, a reconciliation commission would require invalidating the Declaration of Independence for all the victims for that period, and holding that other Constitutional rights like Free Speech, Freedom of Association, Privacy, etc, can be made violable by government decree after the fact, once the conspirators are caught. Otherwise, if those are inviolable, as it would seem the Founders intended, a reconciliation commission would be a non-starter here, in America, due to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and even the Declaration of Independence. If people fucked around and got caught, they have to find out, no takebacks.

I am curious, when Trump talks about having a reconciliation commission for the surveillance, how do experts see that playing out mechanically? Specifically how does it play out, criminally, at the state and federal level, and civilly in terms of lawsuits? Is it even possible?

I am mainly looking at mechanics, and whether any potential mechanism which is obvious to legal eagles might point to the need for targets to take some sort of preemptory action, like filing timed “placeholder lawsuits” against parties unknown, just prior to some decree by the President, to lock in the right to sue, or if that would make a difference.

As far as I can see, I would think the “government” being involved in gangstalking, would preclude any reconciliation commission from working, as it would require temporarily lifting Constitutional rights, in a way which would allow governments in the future to do anything, and simply declare after the fact there can be no consequence, as the government is declaring a reconciliation commission. Is there a mechanism anyone sees, or is it inevitable everything owned by everyone in the surveillance will just get reallocated to the entire rest of the country, as victims/targets of the illegal surveillance, in civil lawsuits, at the least?

It is kind of an important question, as in America, where the Stasi has literally killed people like Aaron Alexis, Brian Mancini, and Miosotis Familia, if reconciliation commissions are feasible in some way, we should be wargaming a way to destroy them, pr at least bypass them, so everyone is held responsible for their evil. I do not know enough about the law however to do that myself, so any discussion of it would be immensely valuable.

*************************************************************************

Interesting –

Why is it always Jewish, from Elon Musk to the teenaged anons on 4Chan. Is that Mossad? And how was he so easily hooked? $400 billion – you would think Tesla would get a head of counterintelligence, and they would keep an eye out for trouble. It does go to show, if he was just a legit geek who was suddenly sitting, all alone, on $400 billion, spooks the world over would be cleaning him out every day until he had nothing, if this obvious plant could ensnare him. He is an asset of somebody who is protecting him, and whoever actually owns that money – nobody is stupid enough to try and take it.

A weaponized FBI: It’s real, whistleblowers testify, boasting scars to prove it.

The Trump administration wants the Supreme Court to permit the firing of the head of the federal agency dedicated to protecting whistleblowers. When you deal with an intelligence operation, everything gets inverted, and agencies where whistleblowers are spposed ot be protect will become places with Cabal agents preparing to ruin and discredit them.

Sen. Rand Paul calls for first Fort Knox Gold audit in 50 years, taps Elon Musk’s DOGE for verification — FOIA requests show 7 out of 13 previous audits reportedly missing.

Trump sends defense stocks crashing. The prospect of no fake foreverwars.

Federal District Judge Tanya Chutkan is poised to issue a temporary restraining order that would block nearly everyone in the Trump administration from accessing any data produced by any federal agency or dismissing any federal or contract workers.

Racist Judge Jack McConnell who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze – received OVER 100 MILLION in government funding to his NGO.

Federal Trade Commission cuts off far-left American Bar Association, “the lawyer’s wing of the Democratic party” — bans appointees from any involvement. And when JFK Jr failed the Bar exam twice, a test with a subjective essay component, everyone snickered, as if it indicated some inferior intellect. Anon, would the conspiracy really try to limit who could be a lawyer to only their people, so you could not find legal representation that was honest and not taking orders from the conspiracy? And they even got into a position where specific lawyers could be “dis-barred,” and forbidden to practice law. Amazing.